|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ on Jan 25, 2016 19:31:30 GMT -6
Folks, I would like to amend Policy Plank 14 by addition of the words underlined:
Also, add a new plank:
|
|
|
Post by Iustì Tíçhern Corneir on Jan 26, 2016 8:52:19 GMT -6
Those both sound good to me.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Jan 27, 2016 19:33:33 GMT -6
I'm good with this. When do we vote?
|
|
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ on Jan 27, 2016 21:40:33 GMT -6
If there are no further comments in a week, we might as well declare it passed by acclamation.
|
|
Brad
Party Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by Brad on Jan 28, 2016 11:16:45 GMT -6
Sounds good!
Not sure where such questions should be placed, please indicate the correct method of asking such things if possible, but I'd also like to humbly request an "ontology of Talossa", a digital hierarchy of "things" and "stuff" that described the current "whole" of the world, the existing "asserted" entities and their relationship to one another. Does such a thing exist in a standard form? with current systems could this information be extracted and asserted in some way? When encountering new systems I tend to want to map them out to understand their "convex hull" in an abstract sense. If anyone has attempted to do this I'd be interested in seeing the data.
|
|
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ on Jan 28, 2016 17:28:56 GMT -6
Ask that question in Wittenberg, Brad.
|
|
Brad
Party Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by Brad on Jan 29, 2016 10:10:53 GMT -6
Ok, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ on Jan 31, 2016 18:11:04 GMT -6
If I don't hear any objections by tomorrow, I'll consider it passed with no dissent.
|
|
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ on Feb 1, 2016 19:43:35 GMT -6
Passed with no dissent.
|
|